Resolve the policy issue through review, not a workaround.
Policy appeal path
Open the exact rejection in Account Quality and compare the ad with its final URL, redirects, claims, business identity, and landing-page content. Remove misleading elements and document the correction before requesting review through the available account route. In the appeal, identify the ad, explain what changed, and attach relevant screenshots without arguing or submitting duplicates. Do not rotate domains, accounts, or disguised pages to evade enforcement; that can make an account problem worse.
- Root causes (redirect domains, disguised landing pages,…. Read the exact rejection notice and compare the ad, destination URL, redirects, and business identity with Meta’s advertising standards.
- Step-by-step appeal framework. Correct the underlying issue and request review through Account Quality if the option is available.
- How to request manual review without triggering permanent bans. Do not rotate domains, accounts, or cloaked pages to bypass the decision.
Check the symptom
Read the exact rejection notice and compare the ad, destination URL, redirects, and business identity with Meta’s advertising standards. Misleading destinations or attempts to evade review can trigger serious account restrictions.
Make the correction
Correct the underlying issue and request review through Account Quality if the option is available. Keep screenshots and a factual explanation of what changed.
Confirm the fix
Do not rotate domains, accounts, or cloaked pages to bypass the decision. If the notice appears incorrect, use Meta’s appeal path and wait for the result before relaunching.
Official reference
Check the current platform controls and policies at this official source ↗. Interfaces and eligibility can vary by account, country, and date.